Most meteorites have lead isotope ratios similar to those of present day common lead. Slusher, and the extensive documentation provided by J. However, close examination of his examples, a few of which are listed in Table 2shows that he misrepresents both the data and their meaning. Many naturalists were influenced by Lyell to become "uniformitarians" who believed that changes were constant and uniform. It should be obvious that the further one projects present rates, the more likely one is to be quite wrong. Without fail, carbon-dating confirms the biblical timescale. There is nothing wrong with these ages; they are consistent with the known geologic relations and represent the crystallization ages of the Canadian samples.
Yet, secularists continue to assume that it gives correct age estimates on rocks of unknown age.
4.55 ± 0.05 Gyr
A small fraction of carbon is c, which contains eight neutrons rather than six. If so, what assumptions have you made? That is, brand new rocks that formed from recent volcanic eruptions such as Mt. Meert probably knows that RATE was well aware of the heat problem from the outset, and that we offered some theories and evidence early on. Such samples are rare, and so nearly all modern Rb-Sr dating is done by the isochron method.